Pope Francis has called on world leaders to put an end to the “cult of money”

16 05 2013

Pope Francis has called on world leaders to put an end to the "cult of money"

Pope Francis has attacked the “dictatorship” of the global financial system and warned that the “cult of money” was making life a misery for millions.

By AFP

VATICAN, May 16, 2013 -

Pope Francis has denounced the global financial system, blasting the “cult of money” that he says is tyrannizing the poor and turning humans into expendable consumer goods.

In his first major speech on the subject, Francis demanded Thursday that financial and political leaders reform the global financial system to make it more ethical and concerned for the common good.

Francis, who has made clear the poor are his priority, made the comments as he greeted his first group of new ambassadors accredited to the Holy See.

He said free-market capitalism had created a “tyranny” and that human beings were being judged purely by their ability to consume goods.

“Money should be made to serve people, not to rule them”, he said, calling for a more ethical financial system and curbs on financial speculation.

Countries should impose more control over their economies and not allow “absolute autonomy”, in order to provide “for the common good”.

The gap between rich and poor was growing in many developed countries, the Argentinian Pope said, two months after he was elected as the successor to Benedict XVI.

“While the income of a minority is increasing exponentially, that of the majority is crumbling,” said Francis, who as archbishop of Buenos Aires visited slums, opted to live in a modest flat rather than an opulent Church residence and went to work by bus.

In poorer countries, people’s lives were becoming “undignified” and marked by violence and desperation, he said.

Francis made the strongly-worded remarks in his first major speech on finance and the economy, during an address to foreign ambassadors in the Vatican.

It underlined a reputation he has established in the last two months for showing deep concern for the plight of the poor and vulnerable.

“The worship of the golden calf of old has found a new and heartless image in the cult of money and the dictatorship of an economy which is faceless and lacking any truly human goal,” Francis told the ambassadors.

As the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Argentina, he often spoke out about the plight of the poor during the country’s economic crisis.

Unchecked capitalism had created “a new, invisible, and at times virtual, tyranny”, said the former Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio.

“The Pope loves everyone, rich and poor alike, but the Pope has the duty, in Christ’s name, to remind the rich to help the poor, to respect them, to promote them,” he said.

Francis will make the first foreign trip of his papacy to Brazil in July, during which he will visit a slum in Rio de Janeiro and meet young prison inmates.

He will attend World Youth Day, a week-long event which is expected to attract more than two million people.

 

 

About these ads




HUNGARY: Christians Churches Fight Right Wing Anti-Semitism

14 05 2013
Main synagogue in Budapest, Hungary

Main synagogue in Budapest, Hungary


By Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor

BUDAPEST, May 14 (Reuters) – When Hungarian radical right-wingers rallied against a Jewish conference in Budapest in early May, a well-known Protestant pastor hid behind the stage while his wife stepped up to the podium to denounce Jews and Israel.

Lorant Hegedus could have preached the same anti-Semitism as his wife, a deputy for the populist Jobbik party in parliament. But his part in launching the rally may cost him his role as the far-right’s favourite clergyman.

With anti-Semitism on the rise here, Christian churches are working with the Jewish community to counter the provocations against Jews and the Roma minority that have won Jobbik support among voters fed up with the country’s economic crisis.

The Hungarian Reformed Church has begun proceedings that might end up defrocking Hegedus and depriving him of his high-profile base at the Homeland Church on the upscale Freedom Square, near the central bank and the United States embassy.

“This is a permanent provocation,” Gusztav Bolcskei, the Church’s presiding bishop, said of Hegedus’s political activity. “It has nothing to do with the Gospel.”

Hungary’s small community of 80,000-100,000 Jews appreciates the Christian support. “We’re satisfied with the actions of the churches,” said Peter Feldmajer, who stepped down as head of the community on Sunday.

“I think, at the end of the day, he will be fired,” he said.

Hegedus declined to be interviewed for this article.

RELIGION IN POLITICS

Supporter of Hungarian far right party Jobbik

Supporter of Hungarian far right party Jobbik

Anti-Semitism has deep roots in Hungary, which began passing anti-Jewish laws in 1920, more than a decade before Nazi Germany. About half a million Hungarian Jews died in the Holocaust, which the Christian churches failed to oppose.

Other trends that resonate with sections of Hungarian society are a tradition of vibrant nationalism after centuries of foreign domination and, more recently, a strong resentment against the country’s largest minority, its 700,000 Roma.

With the country in economic crisis and voters disillusioned by the previous Socialist governments, Jobbik tapped these emotions to win 17 percent of the votes in the 2010 election.

While conservative Prime Minister Viktor Orban has condemned anti-Semitism and rapped Jobbik in recent comments to an Israeli newspaper, he shied away from denouncing the party in a May 5 speech to a World Jewish Congress assembly here only minutes after WJC President Ronald Lauder urged him to do so.

“If Orban goes too hard against Jobbik, he’s worried he won’t be able to scoop up Jobbik’s voters,” said Robin Shepherd, author of a study for the WJC on neo-Nazi parties in Europe.

Neutralised in public during the four decades of communism that ended in 1989, religion has crept back into Hungarian politics in recent years as Orban’s Fidesz party stresses the country’s Christian roots while Jobbik fans resentment of Jews.

This has come despite a dramatic fall in church affiliation. Census figures show that self-declared Roman Catholics dropped from 54 to 39 percent of the population between 2001 and 2011 and self-declared Reformed from 16 to 12 percent.

The Jewish community remained stable at 0.1 percent.

DIFFICULT TO DEFROCK

The resurgent mixture of nationalism and anti-Semitism has presented a challenge for the Reformed Church, which has a strong patriotic tradition rooted in opposition to the Catholic Habsburgs plus church laws allowing wide leeway to its pastors.

Its national leadership has denounced anti-Semitism several times but failed a decade ago to oust Hegedus, whose father was bishop of Budapest at the time. It renewed the effort to defrock him last month after he called for the anti-Jewish rally.

“According to our democratic rules, this should start at the church district level,” Bolcskei said. If the district agrees to move against a pastor, the case then goes up the hierarchy and through church courts before a final decision.

“It can be done, but it’s a very long procedure,” he said.

Thanks to regular dialogue between Jews and Reformed Church leaders, Feldmajer said he understood why Bolcskei – who he said was “totally with us” – could not easily expel Hegedus.

He thought only about 10 percent of Reformed preachers and congregants harboured anti-Semitic views, a figure that matches pollsters’ estimates of Jobbik’s core political support, and hoped the Church leadership could change their minds.

CARDINAL CRITICISED

Hungaran Cardinal Peter Erdo

Hungaran Cardinal Peter Erdo

“It’s easier in the Catholic Church,” said Feldmajer, who praised Cardinal Peter Erdo for his strong support for the Jewish community “not just in a closed room but also in public.”

Jews used to feel some hostility from some Catholic clergy, he said, but that faded away after Erdo became archbishop of Budapest a decade ago, he said.

The Catholic bishops issued an open letter before the 2010 election warning against “neo-pagan tendencies” in some political parties, a clear reference to some Jobbik ideologues who hark back to Hungary’s pre-Christian history.

Erdo, who was frequently mentioned earlier this year as a possible successor to retired Pope Benedict, joined the 2012 Budapest March of the Living to remember the Holocaust.

“I’ve received some hostile letters and criticism in some newspapers saying that the Catholic Church is not patriotic enough,” the cardinal said. “There are also people who say Jesus Christ was not a Jew. Come on, this is crazy.” (Editing by Anna Willard)





VATICAN: Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio elected new Pope

13 03 2013

Argentine Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been elected the Roman Catholic Church’s new Pope.

BBC NEWS – The first Latin American to be Pope, he will call himself Francis I.

An hour earlier, white smoke billowing from the Sistine Chapel chimney announced to the world that cardinals gathered inside had made their choice.

Argentine Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been elected the new Pope

Argentine Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been elected the new Pope

Cardinal Bergoglio replaces Benedict XVI, who resigned last month saying he was not strong enough to lead the Church.

The 115 cardinals have been in isolation since Tuesday afternoon, and held four inconclusive votes.

At least 77 of them, or two-thirds, would have had to vote for a single candidate for him to be elected Pope.

Before the conclave began, there was no clear frontrunner to replace Benedict.

Crowds with umbrellas massed in the square flying flags from around the world.

The Catholic News Agency said people were running through the streets of Rome, hoping to reach St Peter’s Square in time for the appearance of the new Pope.

A troupe of Swiss Guards in silver helmets and full regalia marched to the Basilica in preparation for the announcement, as military bands played for the onlookers.

The new Pope will emerge from the loggia overlooking the square to deliver his first speech.

He will have already accepted an invitation to become Pope and the cardinals will have sworn allegiance to him, after which he will have gone to pray alone.





HUNGARY: Newest amendment to the Constitution would seriously undermine the rule of law

12 03 2013

pismo

Three Hungarian NGOs, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, the Eötvös Károly Institute and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union addressed the Secretary General of the Council of Europe and the European Commission Vice-President, Commissioner in Charge of Justice, Human Rights and Citizenship in order to raise their attention to the planned Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary, threatening the rule of law. The NGOs asked the Secretary General of the Council of Europe to request the Venice Commission to perform an analysis of the proposed amendments.

In the view of the Eötvös Károly Institute, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, the proposed amendments violate fundamental principles and values common to the states of Europe, especially the principles of the rule of law and respect for human rights, threaten their full and proper implementation, and are not in line with Hungary’s obligations towards the European Union.

The planned amendments would undermine the rule of law in Hungary by
1. continuing the practice of inserting provisions into the Fundamental Law which had been previously found unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court;
2. including provisions in the Fundamental Law which violate international standards; and
3. further weakening the control exercised by the Constitutional Court over the Parliament.

The amendments would not only include provisions into the Fundamental Law which do not fit into the text of a constitution, but may also have a serious affect on the level of protection of human rights. The NGOs believe that the amendments will result that the Fundamental Law will cease to qualify as a constitution complying with the fundamental constitutional requirements in this regard.

On 26 February, the three NGOs asked Thorbjørn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, to contribute to ensuring rule of law and respect for human rights in Hungary by requesting the Venice Commission to perform an analysis of the proposed Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law. Viviane Reding, European Commission Vice-President, Commissioner in Charge of Justice, Human Rights and Citizenship, was asked by the NGOs to use the means available to her in order to ensure that Hungary complies with its obligations under the Treaty on European Union.

The unofficial English translation of the proposed Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary as well as a more detailed outline of the main concerns regarding the Fourth Amendment were attached to the letters and are also available on-line.

The letter sent to Secretary General Jagland is available here.

The letter sent to Vice-President Reding is available here.

The document outlining the main concerns regarding the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary can be downloaded here.

The unofficial English translation of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary can be downloaded here.

 





日本: 人権団体、NGOより、日本の首相、国会議員、法務大臣、警察・検察当局宛、公開書簡

12 03 2013

JAPANESE EDITIONFreedom

拉致され、強制棄教させられた日本市民についての公聴会を求める。被害者の8割は女性である。

国境なき人権(2013年3月6日):  独立した人権団体やNGOであり、そして、この文書に署名した私たちは、過去数十年間にわたり、何千と言う市民 (主に女性)が、強制的改宗・棄教のため、力ずくで拉致され、意思に反して私的監獄に閉じ込められ、何ヶ月も、時には何年も、自由を否定され、物理的に虐 待を受け、またあるケースでは、食事制裁を受け、拷問を受けていたことに対し、日本の権威機関が何もしていないことに対し、私たちの驚愕の思いを表明する 次第です。

そのような犯罪から市民を保護できないことは、憲法によって保障された権利と、日本が法的に従う義務のある「市民的および政治的権利に関する国際規約」に 対する重大な侵害です。さらに、被害者の8割は女性であり、「女性に対する暴力の廃絶宣言」そして、日本も調印し、批准している「女子差別撤廃条約」の義 務に対し、日本は違反しています。この問題は、国連当局によっても、アメリカ政府によっても、取り上げられ、日本の評判を著しく損(そこ)なうものです。

ベルギーのブリュッセルに本部を置く独立したNGOである「国境なき人権」は、この問題についての科学的な研究を発表し、人権侵害が、紛れもない事実として起き、そして、継続して行われていることを証明しています(*)。

その「宗教的改宗目的のための、監禁と自由の剥奪」報告書では、「国境なき人権」は、弱小宗教団体の会員が、力ずくで彼らの家族らにより隔離され、家族 と、プロの「ディプログラマー」から抑圧を受けていると実証しています。被害者は、通常、統一教会や、エホバの証人などの宗教に入会した、若く、そして、 教養のある女性です。

過去、何年にもわたり、被害者は、これらの犯罪の加害者に対し、法の裁きを模索してきました。今日にいたるまで、検察官は、明確な犯罪の証拠を無視し、1件の刑事訴追も行っていません。結果として、加害者に対する刑事免責が継続され、もっと多くの犯罪が行われています。

unification_church_carp_rel私たちは、すべての日本国民を保護する責任のある監督官庁に、拉致を終結させ、過去の犯罪について取り組むため、必要な行動を取るよう要請いたします。私 たちは、この真実を明らかにするため、国会に公聴会を開くことを要請いたします。私たちは、過去のおざなりにされたケースの追跡調査のため、司法当局、な らびに警察庁に、独立した内部調査を行うよう要請いたします。私たちは、警察、司法当局が、法律と国際的人権規約に基づき、子供の宗教の自由に関して、何 ができて、何ができないのか、公に発表することを要請いたします。

Willy Fautré, Director of Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l (Belgium)
ウィリー・フォートレ、 「国境なき人権」代表 (ベルギー)

Peter Zoehrer, Director of Forum for Religious Freedom (Austria)
ピーター・ゾウラー、「宗教の自由フォーラム」代表 (オーストリア)

Jura Nanuk, Founder of Central European Religious Freedom Institute (Hungary)
ジュラ・ナヌク、「中央ヨーロッパ宗教自由協会」創設者 (ハンガリー)

Hans Noodt, Director of the Gerard Noodt Foundation for Freedom of Religion or Belief (Netherlands)
ハンズ・Noodt 「宗教・信念の自由のための、Gerard Noodt財団」代表 (オランダ)

Antonio Stango, Director of the Italian Helsinki Committee (Italy)
アントニオ・スタンゴ、「イタリアのヘルシンキ委員会」代表 (イタリア)

Dr Aaron Rhodes, Former Director of the International Helsinki Feeration (Germany)
アーロン・ローズ博士 「国際ヘルシンキ連合」元代表 (ドイツ)

Ion Manole, Executive Director of Promo-Lex (Moldova)
イオン・マノウル、 Promo-Lex 理事 (モルドバ)

Joe Grieboski, Director of the Institute on Religion & Public Policy (USA)
ジョー・グリボスキー、「宗教と公共政策協会」代表 (アメリカ)

Ichiko Sudo, Human Rights & Women’s Dignity Representative for Women’s Federation for World Peace (USA)
イチコ・スドウ、「世界平和女性連合」人権と女性問題担当代表 (アメリカ)

Kathryn Cameron Porter, President of the Leadership Council for Human Rights (USA)
キャスリン・キャメロン・ポーター、「人権指導者会議」会長 (アメリカ)

(*) その報告書は、このリンクで。 http://www.hrwf.org

 

 

 

 

 





JAPAN: Open letter from human rights organizations and NGOs to the Prime Minister, Members of Parliament, the Minister of Justice, Prosecutor and the National Police Agency

10 03 2013

Freedom 

Call for Hearings about Japanese Citizens Abducted and Forced to Change Their Religion: 80% are Women

HRWF (06.03.2013) – We, the undersigned independent human rights organizations and NGOs, are writing to express our shock that Japanese authorities do nothing while over the past decades thousands of citizens-primarily women-have been forcibly abducted, held against their will in private detention places, denied their freedom for months, sometimes years, physically abused and in some cases starved and tortured, in order to force them to change their religious belief.

The failure to protect citizens from such crimes is a grave violation of their constitutionally guaranteed rights and their international human rights based on Japan’s legal obligation under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.  Moreover, as 80% of victims are women, Japan is also in violation of its obligations under the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women signed and ratified by Japan.  This matter has been raised with United Nations officials and by the United States government, and can seriously damage Japan’s reputation.

Human Rights Without Frontiers International, an independent NGO based in Brussels, Belgium, has published a scientific study of this problem, proving beyond any doubt that human rights violations have occurred and continue to take place (*).

In its report, “Abduction and Deprivation of Freedom for the Purpose of Religious De-conversion,” Human Rights Without Frontiers documented that members of minority religions are being forcibly detained by their family members and subjected to coercion by their families and professional ‘deprogrammers.’  The victims are usually young, educated women who have joined religions like the Unification Church or the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Over many years, victims have sought to bring the perpetrators of these crimes to justice.  To date, prosecutors have ignored clear evidence of crimes, and have not pursued a single criminal case.  The result is continuing impunity for perpetrators and more crimes being committed.

unification_church_carp_relWe ask you, authorities responsible for the protection of all Japanese, to take needed actions to stop the kidnappings and to address past crimes.  We ask the Diet to hold public hearings to bring out the truth.  We ask the Judiciary and National Police Agency to conduct an independent internal review, to follow up on cases that have been neglected.  We ask that Police and Judicial authorities inform the public of what steps can and cannot be taken regarding the religious beliefs of children, based on the law and international human rights standards.

Willy Fautré, Director of Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l (Belgium)

Peter Zoehrer, Director of Forum for Religious Freedom (Austria)

Jura Nanuk, Founder of Central European Religious Freedom Institute (Hungary)

Hans Noodt, Director of the Gerard Noodt Foundation for Freedom of Religion or Belief (Netherlands)

Antonio Stango, Director of the Italian Helsinki Committee (Italy)

Dr Aaron Rhodes, Former Director of the International Helsinki Feeration (Germany)

Ion Manole, Executive Director of Promo-Lex (Moldova)

Joe Grieboski, Director of the Institute on Religion & Public Policy (USA)

Ichiko Sudo, Human Rights & Women’s Dignity Representative for Women’s Federation for World Peace (USA)

Kathryn Cameron Porter, President of the Leadership Council for Human Rights (USA)

(*) The report is av available at http://www.hrwf.org





Hungary shows determination on constitution

8 03 2013

Hungary

By Neil Buckley in London and Kester Eddy in Budapest

Just last week, Gabor Ivanyi, head pastor of the Hungarian Evangelical Fellowship, an independent Methodist congregation in Budapest, was celebrating. Hungary’s top court had annulled a controversial law last year that reduced the number of officially recognised churches from more than 350 to little more than two dozen.

The court said the churches law – part of a new constitution introduced by the government of Viktor Orban and his Fidesz party in January 2012 – could lead to politically motivated decisions on recognition. Pastor Ivanyi’s group lost its church status, hitting its funding and charitable work including tending daily to 1,000 homeless people.

“The Fellowship, in God’s name, welcomes the constitutional court ruling with joy. [The church law] destroyed the right to freedom of conscience and religion,” he wrote in an email.

The joy may not last. Amendments being debated by Hungary’s parliament and voted on next week are set to restore both the bulk of the church law and many controversial parts of the new constitution that the constitutional court or European institutions had successfully challenged.

The turnround has taken not just Pastor Ivanyi but the international community by surprise.

The 2012 constitution, and associated “cardinal” laws on different areas also passed by a two-thirds parliamentary majority, was denounced by critics as a “constitutional coup”. They said it weakened democratic checks and balances and endangered media freedom and independence of the judiciary.

Though in piecemeal fashion, the European Commission won some changes to the media and judiciary laws. The Council of Europe, the continent’s top human rights body, secured alterations to the church and justice laws.

Hungary’s constitutional court also struck down some elements, despite being composed increasingly of Fidesz appointees.

Now, critics warn, 14 pages of constitutional amendments could reverse much of that.

“Orban views checks and balances as outdated instruments to tame his will and, accordingly, he is doing his best to remove any obstacle from the glorious road of his ‘revolution’,” said Gordon Bajnai, Hungary’s technocratic prime minister in 2009-10 after the collapse of a discredited socialist government.

Mr Bajnai said the amendments reincorporate into the constitution “all those [areas where] decisions taken by the constitutional court . . . repealed some pivotal elements of Orban’s revolution”.

Mr Orban’s government always insisted Hungary needed a constitutional “reboot” after too long relying on a rewritten Stalin-era constitution. It rebuffed criticisms of the new fundamental law as groundless and orchestrated by its arch-foes, the socialists.

The government this week said criticism was again misplaced and the amendments were anyway being introduced in a Fidesz MP’s private member’s bill, not a government bill.

But why take such provocative action now?

One reason may be that Fidesz’s ratings have fallen sharply since it won 53 per cent of votes in 2010 parliament elections and two-thirds of seats. Recent polls have shown its support at below a quarter of all voters, though large numbers answer “don’t know” or “won’t vote”.

Economic output shrank 1.7 per cent last year – exacerbated, say economists, by Fidesz’s unorthodox policies. But Mr Orban has found blaming foreign banks and EU “interference” resonates politically.

“In some elements it’s just popular [with voters],” says Tamas Boros, director of Policy Solutions, a Budapest think tank.

He adds that Mr Orban takes any defeat badly. “It’s [Fidesz’s] philosophy to aim to win all fights; that no one else should have a say on these issues,” says Mr Boros.

Kim Lane Scheppele, director of Princeton University’s law and public affairs programme, who has monitored Hungary’s new constitution, says legal complexities also played a part.

A constitutional court judgment in December raised the risk of an “unravelling of [Fidesz’s] constitutional system”. The government had to address that risk – and took the opportunity to reinsert some contentious elements.

European Commission officials said it was unclear how serious the latest developments in Budapest would become, but they were monitoring them. The problem if Hungary’s parliament does pass the amendments, say EU experts, is Brussels already used most of its limited tools to deal with backsliding on democratic standards last year – but now Budapest is fighting back.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 741 other followers